Defining a Multi-Cloud Strategy for UK Public Sector Workloads of All Kinds

Published 31st March 2017 in Blogs

Once there was a debate about whether we should move to the cloud or not. Nowadays there is little doubt that the future is cloud as the economic savings and transformational value that it provides are compelling. The debate now is how to move to the cloud, how quickly to do so and which workloads to move first.

Recent outages on AWS and Azure have shown that even the biggest clouds can fail, however organisations are increasingly wary of putting all their eggs in one basket. Typically, such organisations realize that there is a trade-off between proprietary cloud platforms which offer short term convenience and open cloud platforms that offer longer term flexibility.

Proprietary Clouds and Lock-In:

When we talk about proprietary cloud platforms, we mean providers that use technology stacks that are exclusively their own.

You can move workloads between two OpenStack environments without too much trouble or from one VMware provider to another. The problem comes with providers that run a proprietary stack of their own. The moment that you start using their higher-level services and writing to their APIs or to their complex feature sets, you are locking yourself in. For example, if an AWS customer using DynamoDB, Kinesis or Lambda wants to move to another provider, equivalents to these services won’t necessarily exist. Even where they do the software doesn’t transparently allow users to know the key-value store equivalent between the two, which means someone has to rewrite the application for every environment it sits on.

While the proprietary clouds may offer short term convenience, what happens when they themselves become legacy, or when they fail to deliver acceptable value-for-money, appropriate service levels or compliance with data protection legislation.

“While the major public cloud vendors (Amazon, Microsoft, Google) currently drive a great deal of innovation, they might also be trapping themselves and their customers into legacy situations.” Bernd Harzog, Network World.

The UK public sector was only too recently dominated by an oligopoly of about eight major system integrators that dominated the sector, leading to an environment of limited value for money and frequent major project failures. The UK government’s digital by design and cloud first policies, along with its G-Cloud procurement framework, allowed it to break free from this situation. The risk is that having escaped from an oligopoly of eight SIs we may see a move to a duopoly of proprietary cloud providers.

Multi-cloud is the answer, but there are different types of multi-cloud. The dream of workload portability is just that – a dream. The risk is that it will lead to a set of compromises defined by the lowest common denominator. This is not a particularly attractive proposition, and neither are the associated technical and commercial impediments.

Instead in considering a multi-cloud approach, one needs to consider using different clouds for different workloads – with each workload on the optimum platform. The options in order of increasing flexibility are:

You need to match the workloads to the most appropriate environments. There may be some new projects where applications can be developed specifically for the new digital environment as cloud native applications, however the reality is that the vast majority of workloads are on legacy platforms and in legacy applications, and moving these to the cloud can appear a daunting challenge.

Typically, this is done in a pragmatic phased approach:

  1. Assessment of legacy estate: Audit of the inflexible, out-dated infrastructure that is restricting digital transformation.
  2. Transition: Relocation of existing architectures onto modern, agile and trusted IaaS.
  3. Transformation: Adoption of cloud native architectures to provide scalable, flexible platforms.
  4. Digitisation: Optimisation of business processes and transactions to exploit the agility of the cloud.
Example: Oracle Workloads:Back in 2012 the Cabinet Office signed a three-year deal with Oracle and many public sector organisations still retain a significant number of Oracle workloads along with other legacy applications.

Oracle has a reputation for ruthlessness when dealing with its customers. It locks customers into opaque licensing agreements, and subsequently uses technicalities to issue ‘breach notices’, and force clients to raise their retainer to Oracle without any increase in the quantity or quality of their services. A Freedom of Information request in 2015 looked at how much London’s borough councils were spending on Oracle licenses. Over a third (37%) reported that their spending on Oracle had increased by over 20% in the previous two years, while four councils (15% of the sample) had experienced an audit conducted against them in the previous year alone. This demonstrated the willingness of Oracle to strong-arm British government bodies.

Indeed, DEFRA with around 10,000 staff, found that it was paying for 2m Oracle licenses at £155 per employee, for an annual cost of £1.3m per year (at 200 licences per civil servant). This is way above the Cabinet Office guidelines of £93 on licenses, with a view to reducing that down further to £52.

The most straight-forward solution is to transition (see phase 2 above) to an Oracle cloud hosted by an independent cloud provider. With a software stack powered by OVM hypervisor, it can be optimised for the performance and availability of Oracle workloads. This provides full compatibility with support for Oracle-based solutions such as Oracle Database (including features such as encryption and Data Guard), Oracle WebLogic Server, Oracle Fusion Applications, Oracle Enterprise Manager and Oracle E-Business Suite. It also enables you to comply with Oracle’s licensing requirements, while reducing your licencing costs as you only need to license only the processor cores used.

Final considerations:

With less than 10% of central government workloads currently in the cloud, and an even lower ratio elsewhere in public sector, there is still a great deal of work yet to be done. The Government Transformation Strategy is clear on the size of the challenge and the direction of travel. Hopefully a multi-cloud strategy as outlined above will help you on this path.

This blog first appeared on Advice Cloud

Our expert author

UKCloud

Related features

Press Releases

UKCloud Health announces partnership with Shaping Cloud to accelerate digital transformation across healthcare

UKCloud Health launches ‘Transformation Accelerator’ in partnership with Shaping Cloud, using multi-cloud and trusted expertise to reduce cost...
Press Releases

UKCloud Health selected by NHS Shared Business Services to provide multi-cloud services on its new cloud solutions framework

Press Release – UKCloud Health selected by NHS Shared Business Services to provide multi-cloud services on its new cloud solutions...
Press Releases

UKCloud wins approval to provide multi-cloud solutions via Scottish Government’s Cloud Services Framework

London – 6 August 2019 – UKCloud, the multi-cloud experts dedicated to making transformation happen across UK public sector, has today...
Blogs

Five reasons why we love Scotland’s vision of a digital future

The announcement of the new Cloud Services Framework from the Scottish Government brings renewed focus to their Digital Strategy. A strategy which...